Assistive Technology & AI in the Classroom
Most abandoned assistive technology was selected before anyone described the task the student could not do. The SETT framework reverses that order, starting with the student, the environments, and the tasks, and reaching the tool last. The matcher below applies that sequence and returns four tiers of support rather than a single product name.
AT decisions belong to a team, not to a catalog
Consideration is required, and it is not the same as purchase
The IEP team must consider whether the student requires assistive technology devices and services in developing every IEP 34 CFR 300.324(a)(2)(v). Consideration means the team asked the question and recorded an answer with a reason. The federal definition of an assistive technology service is broad, covering evaluation, acquisition, customization, coordination with other therapies, and training for the student, the family, and the staff who work with the student 34 CFR 300.6. Training is the part districts most often omit, and it is the part that determines whether a device is still in use in March.
AI-assisted tools change the top tier of this ladder rather than replacing the ladder. Text-to-speech, speech recognition, and generated summaries lower the cost of access, and they also introduce questions about student data, about output accuracy, and about whether the student is building the skill or bypassing it. The matcher returns the low-tech option alongside the AI option so that the team makes that trade deliberately.
Tiered recommendations
Text-to-speech is a crutch that stops a student from learning to read.
Select to revealAssistive technology services include training for staff and family, not only the device.
Select to revealA device purchased by the district has to stay in the building.
Select to revealWorkplace technology a student learns now is governed by different rules after exit.
Select to reveal